We can't say anything concrete about how Robert Simms voted on live animal export
How Robert Simms voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should allow live animal export and place minimal restrictions on it
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for live animal export” which Robert Simms could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Robert Simms on this policy.
| Division | Robert Simms | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for live animal export” which Robert Simms could have attended.
| Division | Robert Simms | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
13th Oct 2015, 4:12 PM – Senate Motions - Live Animal Exports - Approve Port Alma as a live cattle export facility |
No | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Robert Simms has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.