Compare how Penny Wright and David Feeney voted on tobacco plain packaging

Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for tobacco plain packaging” which either Penny Wright or David Feeney could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Penny Wright and David Feeney on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division	Penny Wright	David Feeney	Supporters vote
10th Nov 2011 – Senate Trade Marks Amendment (Tobacco Plain Packaging) Bill 2011 - Second Reading - Read a second time	Yes	Yes	Yes

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for tobacco plain packaging” which either Penny Wright or David Feeney could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division	Penny Wright	David Feeney	Supporters vote
no votes listed