We can't say anything concrete about how Nick Xenophon voted on requiring Parliamentary approval of military deployments
How Nick Xenophon voted compared to someone who agrees that Australia should not deploy armed forces without the consideration and approval of Parliament
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for requiring Parliamentary approval of military deployments” which Nick Xenophon could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Nick Xenophon on this policy.
Division | Nick Xenophon | Supporters vote |
---|---|---|
4th Sep 2014, 12:52 PM – Senate Defence Legislation Amendment (Parliamentary Approval of Overseas Service) Bill 2014 - Second Reading - Agree with the bill's main idea |
absent | Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for requiring Parliamentary approval of military deployments” which Nick Xenophon could have attended.
Division | Nick Xenophon | Supporters vote |
---|---|---|
17th Mar 2015, 3:49 PM – Senate Motions — Troop Deployment to Iraq |
absent | Yes |
19th Mar 2013, 3:42 PM – Senate Motions - Iraq - Independent inquiry |
Yes | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Nick Xenophon has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.