We can't say anything concrete about how Nick Xenophon voted on deregulating undergraduate university fees
How Nick Xenophon voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should remove limits on the amount that universities can charge students for tuition in Commonwealth Supported Places (CSPs)
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for deregulating undergraduate university fees” which Nick Xenophon could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Nick Xenophon on this policy.
| Division | Nick Xenophon | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
17th Mar 2015, 6:43 PM – Senate Higher Education and Research Reform Bill 2014 - Second Reading - Agree with the bill's main idea |
absent | Yes |
2nd Dec 2014, 5:58 PM – Senate Higher Education and Research Reform Amendment Bill 2014 - Second Reading - Agree with the main idea of the bill |
absent | Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for deregulating undergraduate university fees” which Nick Xenophon could have attended.
| Division | Nick Xenophon | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Nick Xenophon was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.