We can't say anything concrete about how Nick Xenophon voted on increasing funding for road infrastructure
How Nick Xenophon voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should provide more funding for road infrastructure
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing funding for road infrastructure” which Nick Xenophon could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Nick Xenophon on this policy.
| Division | Nick Xenophon | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing funding for road infrastructure” which Nick Xenophon could have attended.
| Division | Nick Xenophon | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
24th Nov 2014, 4:59 PM – Senate Motions - Westconnex - Don't construct WestConnex |
absent | No |
17th Jul 2014, 4:57 PM – Senate Asset Recycling Fund Bill 2014 and Asset Recycling Fund (Consequential Amendments) Bill 2014 — In Committee — Toll roads |
absent | No |
27th Jun 2013, 12:31 PM – Senate Motions — Infrastructure and Transport Funding: Roe Highway - Do not fund |
absent | No |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Nick Xenophon was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.