How Nick Xenophon voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should decrease the subsidisation of taxpayer money into fossil fuels

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for decreasing subsidisation of fossil fuels” which Nick Xenophon could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Nick Xenophon on this policy.

Division Nick Xenophon Supporters vote
no votes listed

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for decreasing subsidisation of fossil fuels” which Nick Xenophon could have attended.

Division Nick Xenophon Supporters vote

12th Nov 2015, 12:42 PM – Senate Motions - OECD Coal Subsidies - Exclude dirtiest coal fired power stations

absent Yes

How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out

Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Nick Xenophon was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.