We can't say anything concrete about how Nick Xenophon voted on restricting foreign ownership
How Nick Xenophon voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should restrict foreign ownership within Australia, particularly where foreign ownership would be against the national interest
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for restricting foreign ownership” which Nick Xenophon could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Nick Xenophon on this policy.
| Division | Nick Xenophon | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for restricting foreign ownership” which Nick Xenophon could have attended.
| Division | Nick Xenophon | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
4th May 2016, 4:06 PM – Senate Motions - Sugar Industry - Act on Committee recommendations |
absent | Yes |
24th Nov 2014, 5:06 PM – Senate Motions - Foreign Investment - Limit foreign investment |
absent | Yes |
17th Jul 2014, 12:34 PM – Senate Qantas Sale Amendment Bill 2014 - Third Reading - Pass the bill |
absent | No |
17th Jul 2014, 11:38 AM – Senate Qantas Sale Amendment Bill 2014 - Second Reading - Agree the main idea of the bill |
absent | No |
14th Nov 2013, 11:28 AM – Senate Motions - Agriculture - Foreign ownership |
absent | Yes |
13th Nov 2013, 4:01 PM – Senate Motions - Wheat Exports - Reject takeover of GrainCorp by Archer Daniels Midland |
absent | Yes |
11th Sep 2012, 4:09 PM – Senate Documents - Cubbie Station - Foreign investment |
absent | Yes |
11th Sep 2012, 3:45 PM – Senate Motions - Cubbie Station - Foreign investment |
absent | Yes |
2nd Feb 2010, 6:08 PM – Senate Foreign Acquisitions and Takeovers Amendment Bill 2009 - Second Reading - Add an amendment |
Yes | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Nick Xenophon has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.