We can't say anything concrete about how Nick Xenophon voted on federal action on public housing
How Nick Xenophon voted compared to someone who agrees that even though public housing is controlled by our state governments, the federal government should also take action to increase the availability of affordable public housing around Australia
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for federal action on public housing” which Nick Xenophon could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Nick Xenophon on this policy.
| Division | Nick Xenophon | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for federal action on public housing” which Nick Xenophon could have attended.
| Division | Nick Xenophon | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
13th Sep 2017, 5:32 PM – Senate Motions - Homelessness - LGBTIQ community |
Yes | Yes |
17th Jun 2015, 3:57 PM – Senate Motions - Housing Affordability - First home buyers and public housing |
absent | Yes |
15th Jul 2014, 3:55 PM – Senate Motions - Affordable Housing - Increase funding for affordable public housing |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Nick Xenophon has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.