We can't say anything concrete about how Nick Xenophon voted on a publicly accessible foreign ownership register for agricultural land
How Nick Xenophon voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should increase transparency by creating a Foreign Ownership Register for Agricultural Land that is available for all citizens to access
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for a publicly accessible foreign ownership register for agricultural land” which Nick Xenophon could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Nick Xenophon on this policy.
| Division | Nick Xenophon | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for a publicly accessible foreign ownership register for agricultural land” which Nick Xenophon could have attended.
| Division | Nick Xenophon | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
24th Nov 2014, 5:06 PM – Senate Motions - Foreign Investment - Limit foreign investment |
absent | Yes |
11th Sep 2012, 3:45 PM – Senate Motions - Cubbie Station - Foreign investment |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Nick Xenophon was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.