At the end of the motion, add: “and the Senate is of the view that the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights be introduced in full into Commonwealth law”.
How Natasha Stott Despoja voted compared to someone who believes that the federal government should increase freedom of political communication in Australia by, for example, protecting people's right to inform others about issues and events in the public interest
|Division||Natasha Stott Despoja||Supporters vote||Division outcome|
13th Sep 2007, 12:39 PM – Senate Commonwealth Electoral Amendment (Democratic Plebiscites) Bill 2007 - Second Reading - International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights
|absent||Yes (strong)||Not passed by a large majority|
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Natasha Stott Despoja was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete other than that they have "never voted" on this policy.