We can't say anything concrete about how Marielle Smith voted on a lower-carbon and less environmentally-damaging transportation system in Australia
How Marielle Smith voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should pass laws and policies which reduce and ultimately eliminate our reliance on fossil-fuel-based transport, and replace it with the most eco-friendly and energy efficient alternative possible
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for a lower-carbon and less environmentally-damaging transportation system in Australia” which Marielle Smith could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Marielle Smith on this policy.
| Division | Marielle Smith | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
21st Jun 2021, 11:58 AM – Senate COAG Reform Fund Amendment (No Electric Vehicle Taxes) Bill 2020 - Second Reading - Agree with bill's main idea |
absent | Yes |
13th May 2020, 4:21 PM – Senate Motions - Transport Infrastructure - Funding for active transport (cycling, walking etc) |
absent | Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for a lower-carbon and less environmentally-damaging transportation system in Australia” which Marielle Smith could have attended.
| Division | Marielle Smith | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
7th Dec 2020, 4:18 PM – Senate Motions - Electric Vehicles - National Electric Vehicle strategy |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Marielle Smith was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.