![Photo of Marielle Smith](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/images/mpsL/10953.jpg)
We can't say anything concrete about how Marielle Smith voted on extending Jobkeeper Payment
How Marielle Smith voted compared to someone who agrees that The JobKeeper payment, which is part of the federal government's response to the Coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic, should be extended for industries that are still being adversely affected by the pandemic, such as the tourism industry
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for extending Jobkeeper Payment” which Marielle Smith could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Marielle Smith on this policy.
Division | Marielle Smith | Supporters vote | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
no votes listed |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for extending Jobkeeper Payment” which Marielle Smith could have attended.
Division | Marielle Smith | Supporters vote |
---|---|---|
23rd Feb 2021, 4:57 PM – Senate Motions - Jobkeeper Payment - Arts and Entertainment Industry |
absent | Yes |
18th Feb 2021, 12:31 PM – Senate Motions - Jobseeker Payment - Extend for tourism industry |
absent | Yes |
13th May 2020, 4:29 PM – Senate Motions - Jobkeeper Payment - Extend |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Marielle Smith was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.