Compare how Marielle Smith and Raff Ciccone voted on banning pay secrecy clauses

Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for banning pay secrecy clauses” which either Marielle Smith or Raff Ciccone could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Marielle Smith and Raff Ciccone on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division	Marielle Smith	Raff Ciccone	Supporters vote
30th Nov 2022, 6:46 PM – Senate Fair Work Legislation Amendment (Secure Jobs, Better Pay) Bill 2022 - Second Reading - Agree with bill's main idea	Yes	Yes	Yes

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for banning pay secrecy clauses” which either Marielle Smith or Raff Ciccone could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division	Marielle Smith	Raff Ciccone	Supporters vote
no votes listed