Compare how Marielle Smith and Raff Ciccone voted on more scrutiny of intelligence services & police
Marielle Smith
Australian Labor Party Senator for SA since July 2019
Raff Ciccone
Australian Labor Party Senator for Victoria since March 2019
How they voted compared with each other and someone who agrees that there should be more scrutiny or oversight of the actions and powers of Australian intelligence and law enforcement agencies, including the Australian Security Intelligence Organisation (ASIO), the Australian Secret Intelligence Service (ASIS) and the Australian Federal Police (AFP)
Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for more scrutiny of intelligence services & police” which either Marielle Smith or Raff Ciccone could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Marielle Smith and Raff Ciccone on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".
| Division | Marielle Smith | Raff Ciccone | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|---|
16th Jun 2021, 11:06 AM – Senate Transport Security Amendment (Serious Crime) Bill 2020 - in Committee - Oversight of ACIC |
absent | Yes | Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for more scrutiny of intelligence services & police” which either Marielle Smith or Raff Ciccone could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".