We can't say anything concrete about how Lucy Gichuhi voted on drug testing welfare recipients
How Lucy Gichuhi voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should introduce mandatory drug testing for people who receive certain welfare payments
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for drug testing welfare recipients” which Lucy Gichuhi could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Lucy Gichuhi on this policy.
| Division | Lucy Gichuhi | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
21st Mar 2018, 11:14 AM – Senate Social Services Legislation Amendment (Welfare Reform) Bill 2017 - in Committee - Agree with bill |
absent | Yes |
7th Dec 2017, 5:59 PM – Senate Social Services Legislation Amendment (Welfare Reform) Bill 2017 - Second Reading - Agree with the bill's main idea |
absent | Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for drug testing welfare recipients” which Lucy Gichuhi could have attended.
| Division | Lucy Gichuhi | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
14th Jun 2017, 4:09 PM – Senate Motions - Budget - Abandon drug testing income support |
No | No |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Lucy Gichuhi has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.