We can't say anything concrete about how Lucy Gichuhi voted on Continuing Detention Orders (CDOs)
How Lucy Gichuhi voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should introduce laws that allow people who have been convicted of certain terrorist offences to be kept in detention even after their custodial sentences have ended if there is an unacceptable risk that they will commit certain serious terrorism offences after being released
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for Continuing Detention Orders (CDOs)” which Lucy Gichuhi could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Lucy Gichuhi on this policy.
| Division | Lucy Gichuhi | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
16th Aug 2018, 11:38 AM – Senate Counter-Terrorism Legislation Amendment Bill (No. 1) 2018 - Second Reading - Agree with bill's main idea |
absent | Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for Continuing Detention Orders (CDOs)” which Lucy Gichuhi could have attended.
| Division | Lucy Gichuhi | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Lucy Gichuhi was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.