We can't say anything concrete about how Lucy Gichuhi voted on Preventative Detention Orders (PDOs)
How Lucy Gichuhi voted compared to someone who agrees that the police should be able to detain people without charge for a limited period if there is a threat of a terrorist attack or if it is likely that vital evidence will be lost after a terrorist attack takes place
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for Preventative Detention Orders (PDOs)” which Lucy Gichuhi could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Lucy Gichuhi on this policy.
| Division | Lucy Gichuhi | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
16th Aug 2018, 11:38 AM – Senate Counter-Terrorism Legislation Amendment Bill (No. 1) 2018 - Second Reading - Agree with bill's main idea |
absent | Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for Preventative Detention Orders (PDOs)” which Lucy Gichuhi could have attended.
| Division | Lucy Gichuhi | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Lucy Gichuhi was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.