![Photo of Lucy Gichuhi](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/images/mpsL/10899.jpg)
We can't say anything concrete about how Lucy Gichuhi voted on protecting citizens' privacy
How Lucy Gichuhi voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should respect its citizens' right to privacy and make sure all sensitive information it does have access to (such as medical, census or tax data) is kept secure
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for protecting citizens' privacy” which Lucy Gichuhi could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Lucy Gichuhi on this policy.
Division | Lucy Gichuhi | Supporters vote | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
no votes listed |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for protecting citizens' privacy” which Lucy Gichuhi could have attended.
Division | Lucy Gichuhi | Supporters vote |
---|---|---|
12th Nov 2018, 3:56 PM – Senate Motions - My Health Record - Extend opt-out period |
absent | Yes |
20th Sep 2018, 12:27 PM – Senate Motions - Right to Privacy - Protect |
absent | Yes |
15th Aug 2018, 4:06 PM – Senate Motions - Digital Encryption - Warrant and privacy |
absent | Yes |
29th Nov 2017, 4:10 PM – Senate Documents - Department of Human Services - Order for the Production of Documents |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Lucy Gichuhi was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.