How Kerrynne Liddle voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should introduce legislation to protect people who disclose information for the benefit of the public interest and protect the journalists who report it

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for protecting whistleblowers” which Kerrynne Liddle could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Kerrynne Liddle on this policy.

Division Kerrynne Liddle Supporters vote

15th Jun 2023, 10:35 AM – Senate Public Interest Disclosure Amendment (Review) Bill 2022 - in Committee - Meaning of public interest disclosure

absent Yes

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for protecting whistleblowers” which Kerrynne Liddle could have attended.

Division Kerrynne Liddle Supporters vote

15th Jun 2023, 11:04 AM – Senate Public Interest Disclosure Amendment (Review) Bill 2022 - in Committee - Parliamentary staff

absent Yes

10th May 2023, 11:33 AM – Senate Public Interest Disclosure Amendment (Review) Bill 2022 - Second Reading - Whistleblowers

absent Yes

How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out

Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Kerrynne Liddle was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.