Compare how Karen Grogan and Peter Whish-Wilson voted on revoking citizenship of dual nationals involved with terrorism offences by the courts
Karen Grogan
Australian Labor Party Senator for SA since September 2021
Peter Whish-Wilson
Australian Greens Senator for Tasmania since June 2012
How they voted compared with each other and someone who agrees that the federal government should give the Minister for Home Affairs the power to apply to the courts to revoke the citizenship of people who have dual nationality (that is, are also citizens of another country) if they take part in certain terrorism-related offences [NOTE: this policy is related to an older policy titled "Revoking citizenship of dual nationals involved with terrorism offences by the minister"]
Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for revoking citizenship of dual nationals involved with terrorism offences by the courts” which either Karen Grogan or Peter Whish-Wilson could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Karen Grogan and Peter Whish-Wilson on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".
| Division | Karen Grogan | Peter Whish-Wilson | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|---|
6th Dec 2023, 12:50 PM – Senate Australian Citizenship Amendment (Citizenship Repudiation) Bill 2023 - Third Reading - Pass the bill |
Yes | No | Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for revoking citizenship of dual nationals involved with terrorism offences by the courts” which either Karen Grogan or Peter Whish-Wilson could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".
| Division | Karen Grogan | Peter Whish-Wilson | Supporters vote | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||