How Grant Chapman voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should make laws and regulations that protect and conserve the health of the Great Barrier Reef for future generations

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for protecting the Great Barrier Reef” which Grant Chapman could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Grant Chapman on this policy.

Division Grant Chapman Supporters vote
no votes listed

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for protecting the Great Barrier Reef” which Grant Chapman could have attended.

Division Grant Chapman Supporters vote

24th Jun 2008, 3:48 PM – Senate Motions - Climate Change - Act on conference conclusions

No Yes

How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out

Grant Chapman has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.

This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.