How Don Farrell voted compared to someone who agrees that staff of government agencies should need a warrant before being able to access the telecommunications records of citizens

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for requiring a warrant to access citizens’ telecommunications records” which Don Farrell could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Don Farrell on this policy.

Division Don Farrell Supporters vote
no votes listed

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for requiring a warrant to access citizens’ telecommunications records” which Don Farrell could have attended.

Division Don Farrell Supporters vote

15th Aug 2018, 4:06 PM – Senate Motions - Digital Encryption - Warrant and privacy

absent Yes

14th Nov 2013, 11:34 AM – Senate Motions - Legal and Constitutional Affairs References Committee Reference - Surveillance

No Yes

How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out

Don Farrell has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.

This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.