How David Fawcett voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should develop and implement a pill testing policy to reduce the risk of death and/or injury caused by taking illicit drugs

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for pill testing” which David Fawcett could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of David Fawcett on this policy.

Division David Fawcett Supporters vote
no votes listed

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for pill testing” which David Fawcett could have attended.

Division David Fawcett Supporters vote

13th Feb 2019, 4:16 PM – Senate Motions - Illicit Drugs - Pill testing

absent Yes

13th Feb 2017, 4:05 PM – Senate Motions - Illicit Drugs - Pill testing

absent Yes

How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out

Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case David Fawcett was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.