How David Fawcett voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should always consult with local communities that may be affected by infrastructure projects, especially for major infrastructure projects such as dams, pulp mills or nuclear facilities

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for local community consultation on infrastructure projects” which David Fawcett could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of David Fawcett on this policy.

Division David Fawcett Supporters vote

23rd Jun 2014, 9:38 PM – Senate Infrastructure Australia Amendment Bill 2013 - in Committee - Local community consultation

absent Yes

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for local community consultation on infrastructure projects” which David Fawcett could have attended.

Division David Fawcett Supporters vote
no votes listed

How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out

Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case David Fawcett was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.