We can't say anything concrete about how Bob Day voted on increasing marine conservation
How Bob Day voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should introduce legislation and regulations that protect and conserve Australia's marine ecosystems such as the Great Barrier Reef
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing marine conservation” which Bob Day could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Bob Day on this policy.
| Division | Bob Day | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
12th Feb 2015, 1:38 PM – Senate Bills – Environment Legislation Amendment Bill 2013 – in Committee – Amendment: extend protections to all threatened species |
absent | Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing marine conservation” which Bob Day could have attended.
| Division | Bob Day | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
12th Oct 2016, 4:06 PM – Senate Motions - Oil Exploration - Great Australian Bight |
absent | Yes |
2nd Mar 2016, 4:32 PM – Senate Motions - Protection of Shark Species - Full protection to five species |
No | Yes |
15th Oct 2015, 12:42 PM – Senate Motions - Oil Exploration - Release Environmental Plan |
absent | Yes |
7th Sep 2015, 3:45 PM – Senate Refer 'supertrawlers' to the Environment and Communications References Committee |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Bob Day has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.