How Bob Day voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should introduce legislation and regulations that protect and conserve Australia's marine ecosystems such as the Great Barrier Reef

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing marine conservation” which Bob Day could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Bob Day on this policy.

Division Bob Day Supporters vote

12th Feb 2015, 1:38 PM – Senate Bills – Environment Legislation Amendment Bill 2013 – in Committee – Amendment: extend protections to all threatened species

absent Yes

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing marine conservation” which Bob Day could have attended.

Division Bob Day Supporters vote

12th Oct 2016, 4:06 PM – Senate Motions - Oil Exploration - Great Australian Bight

absent Yes

2nd Mar 2016, 4:32 PM – Senate Motions - Protection of Shark Species - Full protection to five species

No Yes

15th Oct 2015, 12:42 PM – Senate Motions - Oil Exploration - Release Environmental Plan

absent Yes

7th Sep 2015, 3:45 PM – Senate Refer 'supertrawlers' to the Environment and Communications References Committee

absent Yes

How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out

Bob Day has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.

This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.