How Barbara Pocock voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should be able to intervene in the research grant process with the Australian Research Council (ARC) by, for example, vetoing certain grant application where considered appropriate

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for political intervention in research funding grants” which Barbara Pocock could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Barbara Pocock on this policy.

Division Barbara Pocock Supporters vote
no votes listed

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for political intervention in research funding grants” which Barbara Pocock could have attended.

Division Barbara Pocock Supporters vote

18th Mar 2024, 2:57 PM – Senate Australian Research Council Amendment (Review Response) Bill 2023 - in Committee - Removing international relations veto

absent No

18th Mar 2024, 2:34 PM – Senate Australian Research Council Amendment (Review Response) Bill 2023 - in Committee - Designated research programs

absent Yes

18th Mar 2024, 2:30 PM – Senate Australian Research Council Amendment (Review Response) Bill 2023 - in Committee - Designated research programs

absent No

How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out

Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Barbara Pocock was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.