How Anne Ruston voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should take steps to reduce the amount of waste being generated and exported by Australia

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for reducing waste in Australia” which Anne Ruston could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Anne Ruston on this policy.

Division Anne Ruston Supporters vote
no votes listed

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for reducing waste in Australia” which Anne Ruston could have attended.

Division Anne Ruston Supporters vote

7th Dec 2020, 9:46 PM – Senate Recycling and Waste Reduction Bill 2020 and others - in Committee - Plastic packaging

absent Yes

7th Dec 2020, 9:34 PM – Senate Recycling and Waste Reduction Bill 2020 and others - in Committee - Stronger labelling

absent Yes

7th Dec 2020, 8:52 PM – Senate Recycling and Waste Reduction Bill 2020 and others - in Committee - Mandate

absent Yes

7th Dec 2020, 8:52 PM – Senate Recycling and Waste Reduction Bill 2020 and others - in Committee - Single-use plastics

absent Yes

13th Sep 2012, 11:26 AM – Senate Environment Protection (Beverage Container Deposit and Recovery Scheme) Bill 2010 - Second Reading - Agree with the bill

No Yes

How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out

Anne Ruston has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.

This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.