Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for changing the wording of section 18C of the Racial Discrimination Act” which Anne Ruston could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Anne Ruston on this policy.

Division	Anne Ruston	Supporters vote
30th Mar 2017, 8:45 PM – Senate Human Rights Legislation Amendment Bill 2017 - Second Reading - Agree with bill's main idea	absent	Yes

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for changing the wording of section 18C of the Racial Discrimination Act” which Anne Ruston could have attended.

Division	Anne Ruston	Supporters vote
21st Mar 2018, 4:20 PM – Senate Motions - International Day for the Elimination of Racial Discrimination - Condemn Turnbull Government	No	No
30th Mar 2017, 10:04 PM – Senate Human Rights Legislation Amendment Bill 2017 - in Committee - Change 18C wording	absent	Yes

How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out

Anne Ruston has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.

This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.