Compare how Anne Ruston and Concetta Fierravanti-Wells voted on increasing funding for public schools

Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing funding for public schools” which either Anne Ruston or Concetta Fierravanti-Wells could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Anne Ruston and Concetta Fierravanti-Wells on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division	Anne Ruston	Concetta Fierravanti-Wells	Supporters vote
no votes listed

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing funding for public schools” which either Anne Ruston or Concetta Fierravanti-Wells could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division	Anne Ruston	Concetta Fierravanti-Wells	Supporters vote
3rd Dec 2019, 4:24 PM – Senate Motions - Schools - Drought	No	No	Yes
31st Jul 2019, 4:22 PM – Senate Motions - Education - Capital works fund for public school	No	absent	Yes
17th Oct 2018, 3:42 PM – Senate Motions - Schools - Fund public schools	No	No	Yes
13th Feb 2017, 4:24 PM – Senate Motions - Schools - Needs-based funding model	absent	No	Yes