Compare how Anne Ruston and Zed Seselja voted on increasing funding for legal aid
Anne Ruston
Liberal Party Senator for SA since September 2012
Zed Seselja
Former Liberal Party Senator for ACT September 2013 – May 2022
How they voted compared with each other and someone who agrees that the federal government should maintain or increase funding for the legal assistance sector (Legal Aid, community legal centres, etc.)
Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing funding for legal aid” which either Anne Ruston or Zed Seselja could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Anne Ruston and Zed Seselja on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".
Division | Anne Ruston | Zed Seselja | Supporters vote | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
no votes listed |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing funding for legal aid” which either Anne Ruston or Zed Seselja could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".
Division | Anne Ruston | Zed Seselja | Supporters vote |
---|---|---|---|
29th Mar 2017, 3:54 PM – Senate Motions - Legal Services - Commit funding |
No | No | Yes |
26th Mar 2015, 1:18 PM – Senate Motions - Legal Aid- Increase funding |
No | No | Yes |