We can't say anything concrete about how Anne McEwen voted on a Free Trade Agreement with China
How Anne McEwen voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should enter into a Free Trade Agreement (FTA) with China to create more favourable trading conditions between China and Australia
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for a Free Trade Agreement with China” which Anne McEwen could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Anne McEwen on this policy.
| Division | Anne McEwen | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
9th Nov 2015, 6:14 PM – Senate Customs Amendment (China-Australia Free Trade Agreement Implementation) Bill 2015 and related bill - Third Reading - Pass the bills |
absent | Yes |
9th Nov 2015, 1:48 PM – Senate Customs Amendment (China-Australia Free Trade Agreement Implementation) Bill 2015 and related bill - Second Reading - Agree with bills' main idea |
absent | Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for a Free Trade Agreement with China” which Anne McEwen could have attended.
| Division | Anne McEwen | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
20th Aug 2015, 12:25 PM – Senate Motions - China-Australia Free Trade Agreement - Renegotiate or abandon |
No | No |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Anne McEwen has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.