Compare how Anne McEwen and Paul Calvert voted on reproductive bodily autonomy

Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for reproductive bodily autonomy” which either Anne McEwen or Paul Calvert could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Anne McEwen and Paul Calvert on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division	Anne McEwen	Paul Calvert	Supporters vote
no votes listed

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for reproductive bodily autonomy” which either Anne McEwen or Paul Calvert could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division	Anne McEwen	Paul Calvert	Supporters vote
9th Feb 2006, 4:49 PM – Senate Therapeutic Goods Amendment (Repeal of Ministerial Responsibility for Approval of Ru486) Bill 2005 - Third Reading - Read a third time	Yes	No	Yes
9th Feb 2006, 12:54 PM – Senate Therapeutic Goods Amendment (Repeal of Ministerial Responsibility for Approval of Ru486) Bill 2005 - Second Reading - Read a second time	Yes	No	Yes