We can't say anything concrete about how Andrew McLachlan voted on temporary protection visas
How Andrew McLachlan voted compared to someone who agrees that the Federal government should introduce temporary protection visas
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for temporary protection visas” which Andrew McLachlan could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Andrew McLachlan on this policy.
| Division | Andrew McLachlan | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for temporary protection visas” which Andrew McLachlan could have attended.
| Division | Andrew McLachlan | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
26th Feb 2024, 5:05 PM – Senate Matters of Urgency - National Security - Operation Sovereign Borders |
Yes | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Andrew McLachlan has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.