How Amanda Vanstone voted compared to someone who agrees that the Federal Government should amend the Marriage Act 1961 so that same-sex couples can marry under Australian law
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for same-sex marriage equality” which Amanda Vanstone could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Amanda Vanstone on this policy.
|no votes listed
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for same-sex marriage equality” which Amanda Vanstone could have attended.
8th Feb 2007, 10:47 AM – Senate Motions - Same-Sex Relationships - ACT legalising same-sex relationships
15th Jun 2006, 1:06 PM – Senate Motions - Australian Capital Territory Civil Unions Legislation - Disallow the government's attempt to disallow the legislation
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Amanda Vanstone has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.