We can't say anything concrete about how Santo Santoro voted on same-sex marriage equality
How Santo Santoro voted compared to someone who agrees that the Federal Government should amend the Marriage Act 1961 so that same-sex couples can marry under Australian law
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for same-sex marriage equality” which Santo Santoro could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Santo Santoro on this policy.
| Division | Santo Santoro | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for same-sex marriage equality” which Santo Santoro could have attended.
| Division | Santo Santoro | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
8th Feb 2007, 10:47 AM – Senate Motions - Same-Sex Relationships - ACT legalising same-sex relationships |
absent | Yes |
15th Jun 2006, 1:06 PM – Senate Motions - Australian Capital Territory Civil Unions Legislation - Disallow the government's attempt to disallow the legislation |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Santo Santoro was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.