How Pauline Hanson voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should give the immigration minister the power to revoke the citizenship of people who have dual nationality (that is, are also citizens of another country) if they take part in certain terrorism-related offences

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for revoking citizenship of dual nationals involved with terrorism offences by the minister” which Pauline Hanson could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Pauline Hanson on this policy.

Division Pauline Hanson Supporters vote
no votes listed

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for revoking citizenship of dual nationals involved with terrorism offences by the minister” which Pauline Hanson could have attended.

Division Pauline Hanson Supporters vote

3rd Sep 2020, 4:22 PM – Senate Australian Citizenship Amendment (Citizenship Cessation) Bill 2020 - Second Reading - Agree with the bill's main idea

absent Yes

How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out

Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Pauline Hanson was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.