How Pauline Hanson voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should increase Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander land rights by, for example, increasing their legal recognition and protection

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing Aboriginal land rights” which Pauline Hanson could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Pauline Hanson on this policy.

Division Pauline Hanson Supporters vote
no votes listed

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing Aboriginal land rights” which Pauline Hanson could have attended.

Division Pauline Hanson Supporters vote

21st Mar 2018, 3:58 PM – Senate Motions - Queensland: Native Title - Adani Indigenous Land Use Agreement

absent Yes

How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out

Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Pauline Hanson was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.