We can't say anything concrete about how Paul Scarr voted on requiring Parliamentary approval of military deployments
How Paul Scarr voted compared to someone who agrees that Australia should not deploy armed forces without the consideration and approval of Parliament
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for requiring Parliamentary approval of military deployments” which Paul Scarr could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Paul Scarr on this policy.
| Division | Paul Scarr | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
29th Mar 2023, 10:40 AM – Senate Defence Amendment (Parliamentary Approval of Overseas Service) Bill 2020 - Second Reading - Agree with bill's main idea |
absent | Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for requiring Parliamentary approval of military deployments” which Paul Scarr could have attended.
| Division | Paul Scarr | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Paul Scarr was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.