We can't say anything concrete about how Paul Scarr voted on putting a time limit on immigration detention
How Paul Scarr voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should put a time limit on how long asylum seekers can be detained while their claims for asylum are being processed
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for putting a time limit on immigration detention” which Paul Scarr could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Paul Scarr on this policy.
| Division | Paul Scarr | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for putting a time limit on immigration detention” which Paul Scarr could have attended.
| Division | Paul Scarr | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
13th May 2021, 1:46 PM – Senate Migration Amendment (Clarifying International Obligations for Removal) Bill 2021 - Third Reading - Pass the bill |
absent | No |
13th May 2021, 1:35 PM – Senate Migration Amendment (Clarifying International Obligations for Removal) Bill 2021 - Second Reading - Agree with bill's main idea |
absent | No |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Paul Scarr was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.