We can't say anything concrete about how Nita Green voted on a lower-carbon and less environmentally-damaging transportation system in Australia
How Nita Green voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should pass laws and policies which reduce and ultimately eliminate our reliance on fossil-fuel-based transport, and replace it with the most eco-friendly and energy efficient alternative possible
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for a lower-carbon and less environmentally-damaging transportation system in Australia” which Nita Green could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Nita Green on this policy.
| Division | Nita Green | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
21st Jun 2021, 11:58 AM – Senate COAG Reform Fund Amendment (No Electric Vehicle Taxes) Bill 2020 - Second Reading - Agree with bill's main idea |
absent | Yes |
13th May 2020, 4:21 PM – Senate Motions - Transport Infrastructure - Funding for active transport (cycling, walking etc) |
absent | Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for a lower-carbon and less environmentally-damaging transportation system in Australia” which Nita Green could have attended.
| Division | Nita Green | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
7th Dec 2020, 4:18 PM – Senate Motions - Electric Vehicles - National Electric Vehicle strategy |
Yes | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Nita Green has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.