We can't say anything concrete about how Murray Watt voted on giving approval for mining in the Liverpool Plains
How Murray Watt voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should give approval for new mines in the Liverpool Plains, such as the Shenhua Watermark coal mine
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for giving approval for mining in the Liverpool Plains” which Murray Watt could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Murray Watt on this policy.
| Division | Murray Watt | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for giving approval for mining in the Liverpool Plains” which Murray Watt could have attended.
| Division | Murray Watt | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
15th Nov 2017, 3:59 PM – Senate Motions - Coal Seam Gas Mining: Liverpool Plains - Moratorium |
No | No |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Murray Watt has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.