We can't say anything concrete about how Matthew Canavan voted on climate change inaction
How Matthew Canavan voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should do nothing to address climate change
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for climate change inaction” which Matthew Canavan could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Matthew Canavan on this policy.
| Division | Matthew Canavan | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for climate change inaction” which Matthew Canavan could have attended.
| Division | Matthew Canavan | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
1st Aug 2023, 4:12 PM – Senate Matters of Urgency - Climate Change - "Fearmongering" |
absent | Yes |
9th Aug 2017, 4:48 PM – Senate Committees - Early Retirement of Coal-Fired Power Stations - Don't do |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Matthew Canavan was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.