We can't say anything concrete about how Matthew Canavan voted on voluntary student union fees
How Matthew Canavan voted compared to someone who agrees that university students should be able to choose whether or not to pay student services and amenities fees (also called student union fees)
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for voluntary student union fees” which Matthew Canavan could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Matthew Canavan on this policy.
| Division | Matthew Canavan | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for voluntary student union fees” which Matthew Canavan could have attended.
| Division | Matthew Canavan | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
17th Oct 2017, 3:52 PM – Senate Motions - Higher Education - Student Services and Amenities Fee |
absent | Yes |
17th Oct 2017, 3:48 PM – Senate Motions - Higher Education - Student Services and Amenities Fee |
absent | Yes |
26th Nov 2015, 12:12 PM – Senate Motions - Student Services and Amenities Fee - Students should have to agree to SSAF |
No | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Matthew Canavan has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.