How Mark Furner voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should not put asylum seeker children into immigration detention and should release all children now in detention

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for removing children from immigration detention” which Mark Furner could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Mark Furner on this policy.

Division Mark Furner Supporters vote

16th May 2013, 12:02 PM – Senate Migration Amendment (Unauthorised Maritime Arrivals and Other Measures) Bill 2012 - In Committee - Vulnerable persons

absent Yes

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for removing children from immigration detention” which Mark Furner could have attended.

Division Mark Furner Supporters vote

27th Aug 2008, 4:21 PM – Senate Motions - MV Tampa: Seventh Anniversary - Inquiry into immigration detention

No Yes

How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out

Mark Furner has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.

This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.