We can't say anything concrete about how Larissa Waters voted on getting rid of Sunday and public holiday penalty rates
How Larissa Waters voted compared to someone who agrees that there should be no penalty rates when employees work on Sundays or public holidays
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for getting rid of Sunday and public holiday penalty rates” which Larissa Waters could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Larissa Waters on this policy.
| Division | Larissa Waters | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
30th Mar 2017, 12:50 PM – Senate Fair Work Amendment (Protecting Take-Home Pay) Bill 2017 - Third Reading - Pass the bill |
absent | No |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for getting rid of Sunday and public holiday penalty rates” which Larissa Waters could have attended.
| Division | Larissa Waters | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
21st Mar 2017, 4:02 PM – Senate Motions - Workplace Relations - Penalty relates |
absent | No |
4th Sep 2014, 12:28 PM – Senate Motions - Australian Workforce - Insecure work |
Yes | No |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Larissa Waters has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.