Compare how Larissa Waters and Janet Rice voted on storing all citizens' telecommunications data for access by government agencies
Larissa Waters
Australian Greens Senator for Queensland since September 2018
Janet Rice
Former Australian Greens Senator for Victoria July 2014 – April 2024
How they voted compared with each other and someone who agrees that telecommunications providers should be required to store all their customers' usages data for later access by agencies with the Attorney General's consent
Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for storing all citizens' telecommunications data for access by government agencies” which either Larissa Waters or Janet Rice could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Larissa Waters and Janet Rice on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".
Division | Larissa Waters | Janet Rice | Supporters vote |
---|---|---|---|
26th Mar 2015 – Senate Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Amendment (Data Retention) Bill 2015 - Third Reading - Pass the bill |
No | No | Yes |
24th Mar 2015, 8:46 PM – Senate Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Amendment (Data Retention) Bill 2015 - Second Reading - Agree with the bill's main idea |
No | No | Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for storing all citizens' telecommunications data for access by government agencies” which either Larissa Waters or Janet Rice could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".
Division | Larissa Waters | Janet Rice | Supporters vote |
---|---|---|---|
16th Mar 2016 – Senate Motions - Mandatory Telecommunications Data Retention Scheme - Repeal the scheme |
Yes | Yes | No |