We can't say anything concrete about how John Hogg voted on requiring Parliamentary approval of military deployments
How John Hogg voted compared to someone who agrees that Australia should not deploy armed forces without the consideration and approval of Parliament
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for requiring Parliamentary approval of military deployments” which John Hogg could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of John Hogg on this policy.
Division | John Hogg | Supporters vote | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
no votes listed |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for requiring Parliamentary approval of military deployments” which John Hogg could have attended.
Division | John Hogg | Supporters vote |
---|---|---|
19th Mar 2013, 3:42 PM – Senate Motions - Iraq - Independent inquiry |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case John Hogg was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.