Compare how Joe Ludwig and Dana Wortley voted on increasing marine conservation

Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing marine conservation” which either Joe Ludwig or Dana Wortley could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Joe Ludwig and Dana Wortley on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division	Joe Ludwig	Dana Wortley	Supporters vote
12th Feb 2015, 1:38 PM – Senate Bills – Environment Legislation Amendment Bill 2013 – in Committee – Amendment: extend protections to all threatened species	No	-	Yes

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing marine conservation” which either Joe Ludwig or Dana Wortley could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division	Joe Ludwig	Dana Wortley	Supporters vote
2nd Mar 2016, 4:32 PM – Senate Motions - Protection of Shark Species - Full protection to five species	Yes	-	Yes
15th Oct 2015, 12:42 PM – Senate Motions - Oil Exploration - Release Environmental Plan	No	-	Yes
7th Sep 2015, 3:45 PM – Senate Refer 'supertrawlers' to the Environment and Communications References Committee	Yes	-	Yes
16th Jun 2014, 5:54 PM – Senate Documents - World Heritage Committee - Protect the Fitzroy Delta, Keppel Bay, north Curtis Island and northern section of the reef	No	-	Yes
9th Dec 2013, 4:26 PM – Senate Motions - Kangaroo Island - Reject seismic testing proposal	No	-	Yes
13th Nov 2013, 4:08 PM – Senate Motions - Great Barrier Reef - Reject the Abbot Point coal port expansion proposal	No	-	Yes
26th Jun 2013, 4:14 PM – Senate Motions - Marine Parks - Support Goverment's network of marine parks	absent	-	Yes
20th Jun 2013, 12:15 PM – Senate Motions - Environment - Amend environment laws	No	-	Yes
17th Jun 2013, 3:57 PM – Senate Motions - Great Barrier Reef World Heritage Area - Maintain heritage status	No	-	Yes
22nd Mar 2012, 1:56 PM – Senate Motions - Great Barrier Reef - Oppose offshore dumping	absent	-	Yes
22nd Mar 2012, 1:53 PM – Senate Motions - Mining - Moratorium on coal seam gas	absent	-	Yes
22nd Mar 2012, 1:50 PM – Senate Motions - Marine Conservation - Moratorium on issuing oil and gas leases	absent	-	Yes
10th Nov 2011 – Senate Motions - Great Barrier Reef - Suspend applications and approvals until after UNESCO assessment	absent	-	Yes
9th Nov 2011 – Senate Motions - Coral Sea - Declare marine national park	No	-	Yes
9th Nov 2011 – Senate Motions - Great Barrier Reef - Suspend applications and approvals until after UNESCO assessment	No	-	Yes
27th Aug 2008, 5:01 PM – Senate Great Barrier Reef Marine Park and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2008 - Referral to Committee	absent	No	No
27th Aug 2008, 4:08 PM – Senate Motions - Gunns Pulp Mill - Provide the report on potential marine impact	No	No	Yes
21st Jun 2007, 8:40 PM – Senate Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Amendment Bill 2007 - In Committee - extend boundaries of Park to EEZ	Yes	Yes	Yes
30th Mar 2006, 4:18 PM – Senate Motions - Great Barrier Reef Marine Park - Add to endangered list	Yes	Yes	Yes