We can't say anything concrete about how Jo Lindgren voted on Adani's proposed Carmichael coal mine in the Galilee Basin
How Jo Lindgren voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should support the Adani Group's plans to build the Carmichael mine in Queensland's Galilee Basin
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for Adani's proposed Carmichael coal mine in the Galilee Basin” which Jo Lindgren could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Jo Lindgren on this policy.
| Division | Jo Lindgren | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for Adani's proposed Carmichael coal mine in the Galilee Basin” which Jo Lindgren could have attended.
| Division | Jo Lindgren | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
17th Mar 2016, 12:39 PM – Senate Motions - Climate Change - Support a rapid transition to clean energy |
No | No |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Jo Lindgren has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.