We can't say anything concrete about how Jan McLucas voted on net zero emissions by 2050
How Jan McLucas voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should commit to achieving net zero emissions by 2050 as part of Australia's efforts to address climate change
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for net zero emissions by 2050” which Jan McLucas could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Jan McLucas on this policy.
| Division | Jan McLucas | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for net zero emissions by 2050” which Jan McLucas could have attended.
| Division | Jan McLucas | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
15th Jul 2014, 9:31 PM – Senate Clean Energy Legislation (Carbon Tax Repeal) Bill 2014 and related bills - Second Reading - Protect from climate change |
No | Yes |
17th Mar 2014, 1:46 PM – Senate Clean Energy Legislation (Carbon Tax Repeal) Bill 2013 and related bills - Second Reading - Protect Australia from climate change |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Jan McLucas has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.